Judicial deliberations a comparative analysis of transparency and legitimacy
The author compares how and why the European Court of Justice the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation and ultimately judicial legitimacy
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | eBook |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Oxford
Oxford University Press
2009, 2009
|
| Series: | Oxford studies in European law / Oxford studies in European law
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | |
| Collection: | Oxford University Press - Collection details see MPG.ReNa |
| Summary: | The author compares how and why the European Court of Justice the French Cour de cassation and the United States Supreme Court offer different approaches for generating judicial accountability and control, judicial debate and deliberation and ultimately judicial legitimacy |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Originally published: 2004 |
| Physical Description: | ix, 382 p. |
| ISBN: | 9780191706714 019170671X |